During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
“既要扎根生活，也要走出去，这样民俗一定能活起来、火起来。”汤春山说。，详情可参考服务器推荐
，这一点在Line官方版本下载中也有详细论述
Source: Computational Materials Science, Volume 266
人类智慧的稀缺性自带内在溢价，但机器智能正在广泛、甚至是合格且快速改进地替代着前者。好在的是，我们是在 2026 年看到这篇报告。。业内人士推荐51吃瓜作为进阶阅读